The Centre’s decision to liberalise liquor sales in Ladakh and end decades-long prohibition in Lakshadweep has drawn criticism from social, religious and political groups, with opponents arguing that the measures could undermine local cultural values and increase alcohol-related social issues.
In Ladakh, the newly approved excise policy allows the sale of hard liquor, including Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) and imported spirits, expanding beyond the earlier framework that permitted only beer, wine and ready-to-drink beverages through retail outlets. The policy also permits liquor sales at guest houses and homestays and increases the number of licensed liquor outlets in the Union Territory from two to 20.
The Ladakh administration has defended the move, stating that the revised policy aims to strengthen regulation, curb illicit alcohol trade and support tourism through a more structured framework. However, organisations including the Ladakh Buddhist Association and Jamiat Ul Ulama Isna Asharia Kargil have opposed the decision, warning of its potential impact on the region’s social fabric, youth welfare and cultural identity. Several community leaders have called for the immediate withdrawal of the policy and cautioned against turning Ladakh into a destination driven by alcohol-based tourism.
Meanwhile, in Lakshadweep, the administration has approved the Lakshadweep Excise Regulation 2026, repealing the prohibition law that had largely restricted alcohol sales in the archipelago since 1979. The new regulation allows authorities to issue licences for the import, export, manufacture, sale and purchase of alcoholic beverages and permits government-owned entities to participate in alcohol distribution.
The move follows earlier decisions to allow liquor sales at select government-run guest houses and tourism facilities. Critics, including local civil society groups and Lakshadweep MP Muhammed Hamdullah Sayeed, have argued that the changes were introduced without adequate public consultation and could lead to increased alcohol consumption among young people. They have urged the administration to reconsider the policy, citing the islands’ long-standing support for prohibition and concerns over its social consequences.
The developments have reignited debate over balancing tourism growth and economic opportunities with local cultural sensitivities and public health considerations in the two Union Territories.
